Jan 12, 2025

Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S.Ct. 247, 63 L.Ed.2d. (1919)

Schenck v. United States was a 1919 Supreme Court case involving Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer, who were convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917. They were charged with conspiracy to obstruct military recruitment during World War I by distributing leaflets that urged men to resist the draft. The defendants appealed their convictions, arguing that the Espionage Act violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and press.

The Key Issues

The main question before the Court was whether the distribution of anti-draft leaflets during wartime was protected speech under the First Amendment. The Court had to determine if the government could restrict speech that it deemed harmful to the war effort, even if that speech would normally be protected in peacetime.

KEY POINTS:

  • The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting “fire” in a crowded theater.
  • The government could criminalize certain speech if the speech created a clear and present danger of bringing about substantive evils.
  • The character of every act depends on the circumstances in which it is done.

Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the convictions. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court, establishing the “clear and present danger” test for limiting free speech. He argued that the First Amendment does not protect speech that creates a clear and present danger of bringing about substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.

Significance

Schenck v. United States is a landmark case in First Amendment jurisprudence. It introduced the clear and present danger test, which became an important standard for evaluating restrictions on free speech. Although later decisions have modified and in some ways superseded this test, Schenck remains a significant case in the history of free speech law in the United States.

Historical Context

The case must be understood in the context of World War I and the prevailing attitudes of the time. The government was deeply concerned about maintaining public support for the war effort and viewed anti-war speech as a threat to national security. This case reflected the tension between civil liberties and national security interests during wartime, a tension that continues to be relevant in contemporary debates about free speech and national security.

The United States Supreme Court

Other Notable Cases